There are 432 members of the Warwick Mathematics Society, of which 0 are new today!
We're 86% of the way toward our target of 500 members.
You can join up on the UWSU website.
Who's new
john20
wilbsz
Chip_Moore
RhysGardener
Ray Tango1
Measure Theory Question
Matthew
Posted: Submitted by Matthew on 12 April 2010 - 1:13am.
Joined: 2007-11-03
Posts: 12
From sheet 4 question A4b)
If in measure and in measure (for measureable and ) show that in measure if , but not necessarily if .
Here's what I've got:
Fix and . Then there exists such that and . Otherwise and are unbounded on a set with measure greater than 0. This is the bit I'm not sure about; does this give a contradiction with and being measurable or with and being Cauchy in measure? I figure it'd be pretty annoying taking infinity from infinity on a set of measure greater than zero when we look at . Does it use (since the rest of the proof doesn't)? Or is this just wrong?
Anyway if this turns out to be true the rest of the proof follows like so:
So
Take such that
So
I can't see how to use or picture a counter example for . Any ideas would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Matt