Greetings,

I am posting to notify you all that I have found a brilliant new line of attack on the famous Riemann Hypothesis that I do believe will result in a spectacular proof. This is all my own work and in fact I've been thinking about it for a few years now (I have started working on the problem in 2008-2009), although I have made a crucial breakthrough a short time ago. This proof is the most amazing thing I've ever thought of, extremely simple and elegant. And it works like this:

* As is well known from the Riemann zeta function's functional equation, any point in the zeta-set of non-trivial zeros gives rise to at most three others by reflections in the critical line and real axis.
* Now, if a certain zero is a counterexample to the Riemann Hypothesis, this gives rise to three other distinct reflected points.
* The elliptic curve through the three other points defines an elliptic curve over the rationals. This elliptic curve is clearly not modular. Here is a diagram depicting the situation:
* This contradicts the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, which states that any elliptic curve over the rationals is modular.
* We can therefore conclude that the dimension of the zeta-set is one and thus that the Riemann Hypothesis is true.

I will gladly answer any questions you may have. The method extends to a wealth of other important problems, such as Fermat's Last Theorem, the Goldbach conjecture, n-body problem, continuum hypothesis, etc.

Thank You,
Andrew Ewart

I have also worked on several other concjectures which will be posted here soon

What are you trying to achieve here, Andy? It's painfully obvious to everyone that you have just copied and pasted my own work (from a thread which I have posted more than a full day before your vain attempt, no less) with virtually no changes. If you're going to try to steal my ideas you should at least make a conscious effort to conceal your plagiarism.

pss How is it possible that you have thought about it for a "few years" yet have started in 2008-2009?

lol u cant count up to 2 = a few, so how do u except to come up with said conjectures, ans u didn't.
So stop getting off ur high horse and give over
Your real lord and master
ka7th
(ps not to be confused with ur true lord and master, who is a rabid cartoon grey squirrel called foamy who rants about topical things)

If that's the best you can do we might as well stop this right now. Say it publicly and you're insane, no one wants to hear about it now. I think everyone can see that all you've done is copy and paste my mesage from the other thread anyway, so we may as well leave it at that.

pss In the best of cases, according to what you have said (and ignoring the fact that it's a patent lie), you've been thinking about this since the 1st of January 2008, which was a year and a half ago and not two. History quickly crashing through your veins, my friend.

if u got a postgrad at cambridge, then what r u doing here
except u never got in, and u wernt in the news
so that makes u like cake = a lie

Where are the other conjectures you had promised to post? Are you waiting for me to post some so that you can copy and paste them into your own thread?

megalolz

You shouldn't have moved into check.