The Warwick Mathematics Society Website

User login

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

There are 497 members of the Warwick Mathematics Society, of which 0 are new today!
We're 99% of the way toward our target of 500 members.
You can join up on the UWSU website.

Answer this, lame-os

Post Icon Posted: Submitted by cj on 23 April 2008 - 10:25pm.

Joined: 2006-10-10
Posts: 519

OK, so I copied this out of Viz, and already told Richard, but its an awesome problem which really shouldn't be hard :P I'm paraphrasing, but it was from the letters page and it went like this

If mirrors reverse everything, why doesn't it look like I'm moonwalking when I walk past a mirror?

A letterbocks pencil for the shortest, most clear answer*

*Offer of prize is for entertainment value only

Post Icon Posted: 23 April 2008 - 10:33pm

Joined: 2007-10-03
Posts: 375

A mirror doesn't reverse everything, if you put your right hand up in front of it you'll still see it being at your right, the only thing that's changed is depth, which then changes the handedness, in the same way that a reflection changes the orientation in the plane.

Thanks for the letterbocks pencil

Post Icon Posted: 25 April 2008 - 1:18am

Joined: 2007-10-04
Posts: 188

What he said ^^ (Please note the shortness and clearness of my answer)

Post Icon Posted: 25 April 2008 - 2:17am

Joined: 2006-10-01
Posts: 427

Because you're sh*t at walking.

Post Icon Posted: 25 April 2008 - 2:36am

Joined: 2006-10-01
Posts: 427

Our natural definition of left and right is contingent on our definition of forwards and backwards. Whatever is forward: right is 90 degrees clockwise to it, and left 90 degrees anti-clockwise: thus a mirror, which only reverses depth, appears to reverse left and right, when in fact it does not. Our mistake is to empathise with the man in the mirror, and judge his left and right by our own standards when his clockwise can only be our anti-clockwise.

Post Icon Posted: 25 April 2008 - 2:50am

Joined: 2007-10-24
Posts: 9

You've made it sound a bit like there's a "trick of the mind" going on, when all it comes down to is the image being reversed due to the light reflecting off the mirror... there's no "why" it's simply "how".

Post Icon Posted: 25 April 2008 - 4:04am

Joined: 2006-10-01
Posts: 427

"Why" is always a more interesting question than "how". "How" is for the engineering department to answer.

'Sides, the question asked was a "why".

Post Icon Posted: 25 April 2008 - 9:39am

Joined: 2006-10-05
Posts: 675

why is for the philosophy department to answer.

Why are we even answering this at all then?

Oops, thats another philosophy department question.

Post Icon Posted: 26 April 2008 - 3:54am

Joined: 2006-11-02
Posts: 1005

It's pretty much just like cheese falling off a cliff. You reverse the orientation that way.

Post Icon Posted: 30 April 2008 - 7:47am

Joined: 2006-10-18
Posts: 26

Because the mirror only reverses spacial dimensions, not time. Easy.