The Warwick Mathematics Society Website

User login

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

There are 553 members of the Warwick Mathematics Society, of which 0 are new today!
We're 110% of the way toward our target of 500 members.
You can join up on the UWSU website.

Differentiation

Newtonswig
Post Icon Posted: Submitted by Newtonswig on 25 February 2008 - 2:15pm.

Joined: 2006-10-01
Posts: 439

Noone understands Implicit function theorem 1st time through : FACT

I know a really good way of explaining it and all of this module's myriad mysteries. If you want it- post here!

RIP WMS Forums
Post Icon Posted: 25 February 2008 - 2:46pm

Joined: 2006-10-05
Posts: 713

Yeah, I could go for that.

cj
Post Icon Posted: 25 February 2008 - 5:53pm

Joined: 2006-10-10
Posts: 524

ME PLX

cosmin
Post Icon Posted: 25 February 2008 - 6:20pm

Joined: 2006-11-02
Posts: 1291

Could be useful, I'll at least see what I've missed. :p

Newtonswig
Post Icon Posted: 25 February 2008 - 6:38pm

Joined: 2006-10-01
Posts: 439

So do we want the implicit function theorem on its own or should I throw in the inverse function theorem for giggles?

Or should I just do a survey of the whole damn subject?!

RIP WMS Forums
Post Icon Posted: 25 February 2008 - 9:20pm

Joined: 2006-10-05
Posts: 713

I vote whole damn subject.

Orry
Post Icon Posted: 25 February 2008 - 11:08pm

Joined: 2007-02-14
Posts: 115

I would certainly come along, unless I was busy, or had something more exciting to do.
Both these things are unlikely.

Sleeping Yeti
Post Icon Posted: 26 February 2008 - 12:19pm

Joined: 2007-03-03
Posts: 196

I vote whole damn subject, but with emphasis on the bits nobody understands. I think we can skip the definition of a norm, for instance.

darthsteven
Post Icon Posted: 26 February 2008 - 1:08pm

Joined: 2006-08-31
Posts: 699

I vote I don't give it this year, after my "linear map" fiasco. :-D

mauggy
Post Icon Posted: 27 February 2008 - 6:52pm

Joined: 2007-05-16
Posts: 1

Differentiation crash course please!

Lozzer
Post Icon Posted: 27 February 2008 - 7:29pm

Joined: 2008-02-27
Posts: 1

I'd be up for that, I've forgotten everything and I'm not exactly looking forward to learning everything again

NMarkey
Post Icon Posted: 27 February 2008 - 9:21pm

Joined: 2007-10-08
Posts: 1

I'd like to give the crash course a try please!

derek_dreery
Post Icon Posted: 27 February 2008 - 9:51pm

Joined: 2007-06-03
Posts: 4

yes please

maugbj
Post Icon Posted: 27 February 2008 - 10:32pm

Joined: 2006-12-13
Posts: 1

I'm up for that!

christovsky
Post Icon Posted: 28 February 2008 - 12:36am

Joined: 2007-11-13
Posts: 1

I agree, I'd like to see this happen (and I'd prefer an overview of the whole subject).

chris.cubed
Post Icon Posted: 28 February 2008 - 1:41am

Joined: 2006-10-17
Posts: 1

I'd also be in favour of a crash course. Also some degree of view to the future i.e. what do we need to know from this course in modules next year which have this as a pre req?

Thanks

wriches
Post Icon Posted: 28 February 2008 - 1:57am

Joined: 2007-10-24
Posts: 9

A crash course on the entire module would be amazing - I've missed virtually the whole course. Possible to fit this into just an hour though?

daniel.whittaker
Post Icon Posted: 28 February 2008 - 11:04am

Joined: 2007-12-22
Posts: 2

Yes please the whole module if possible!

leigh_s123
Post Icon Posted: 28 February 2008 - 3:55pm

Joined: 2007-12-06
Posts: 3

The whole subject would be really useful pretty please :) x x x

richardhp
Post Icon Posted: 2 March 2008 - 12:06am

Joined: 2007-10-01
Posts: 239

count me in

Newtonswig
Post Icon Posted: 7 March 2008 - 4:06pm

Joined: 2006-10-01
Posts: 439

Now begins our intensive review system...

Questions? Comments?

Too Slow? Too fast?!

More examples? Should it have been a 2 man job so I didn't get lost looking for a precise statement of the IFT? :p

Planktonboy
Post Icon Posted: 7 March 2008 - 4:59pm

Joined: 2007-10-04
Posts: 214

I was sorely tempted to Troll this thread and say the lecture was rubbish. However the huge backlash against me may have distorted the feedback somewhat. Consider yourselves lucky :p

richardhp
Post Icon Posted: 9 March 2008 - 10:56am

Joined: 2007-10-01
Posts: 239

somehow you managed to troll it anyway

Planktonboy
Post Icon Posted: 9 March 2008 - 6:24pm

Joined: 2007-10-04
Posts: 214

Trolling is the art of making a contentious statement just to cause outrage. But I thought he really might need serious feedback. Come on people, let him feel your love!

cosmin
Post Icon Posted: 9 March 2008 - 6:58pm

Joined: 2006-11-02
Posts: 1291

I thought it was quite good overall, most of your explanations were clear and concise (with the exception of O(h) and the IFT I think :p). The lack of examples was to be expected since people wanted a full review of the course in two hours (and also since 99% of said examples are horribly boring), which leaves little time for anything besides the main theorems, but you still gave some idea of what those examples could be I guess. All in all I think it should have been pretty helpful to most people.

Newtonswig
Post Icon Posted: 9 March 2008 - 9:55pm

Joined: 2006-10-01
Posts: 439

Was the IFT (i'm guessing I is for "implicit" rather than "inverse") understandable in the end though?

cosmin
Post Icon Posted: 9 March 2008 - 11:27pm

Joined: 2006-11-02
Posts: 1291

I suspect it was (it was to me at the very least), it was mostly a case of it taking a bit too much time I think.

xiaotao77
Post Icon Posted: 4 May 2012 - 1:39am

Joined: 2012-05-04
Posts: 23

enjoying your post! I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.F50-532//F50-533//F50-536//FCNSP//G2700//ISC2//9l0-008//HP0-Y12//646-206//HP2-Z21//CISSP//GCIA

sami0
Post Icon Posted: 22 May 2012 - 4:52am

Joined: 2012-05-07
Posts: 4

There are numerous ways to get engaged in the pouring,1z0-051 dumps of the Statesman Science Association, from helping,70-290 dumps out at Maths Cafe,642-357 dumps functional a word unit submitting reader's quotes.